Men Undershirt

Bottom line: this is far and away the best quality undershirt you can get for the price, and quite possibly the best undershirt you can own, depending on what you're looking for, which I'll illustrate below:The black modal v-neck is super lightweight, with under-armor levels of stretch and similar shine, but more structure, making it more wearable as a top layer but still a little too sheer and lightweight for my tastes in an outer layer. However, it's definitely not lighter weight, loose under-armor that fits like a poncho.Modal is in general an awesome material, and fairly hard to find in a t-shirt (let alone at this price point), it fits almost invisibly under nearly any shirt, and it maintains it's shape, so your sleeves don't bunch up. It's also quite long, so it leaves plenty of room to tuck in (but this might be a negative if you intend on wearing the shirt on it's own). Other than that, the shirt fits a little on the large end compared to a "standard" shirt, but because it both stretches and drapes exceedingly well, I'd still go with your "regular" size, unless you plan on wearing it on it's own on a regular basis.With that being said, the undershirt closest in quality that I've ever purchased was the same price for a single shirt (which ultimately, wasn't as nice as these)...so moving forward, I'm going all in on these whenever I need new undershirts!

Finding good form-fitting shirts is a nightmare! They're either woefully expensive or they aren't made of the right materials (a cotton shirt isn't form-fitting, it's just tight). I've been rocking a men's shirt from REGNA for the past years and would have bought more of theirs if they still manufactured it.So instead I had to find a new brand, and I stumbled onto David Archy. The investment price was a little high but I took the leap a month or two ago. These have a completely different feel to other form-fitting shirts I've worn. These are much "softer" and stretchier. It took me a while to get used to the sensation.The good thing is that they vent your skin a lot better. I've found that I sweat less egregiously while wearing this shirt which is great as I have poor temperature regulation and tolerance. If you wear this as a primary shirt, you will have to regularly "pull it down" just for ease of mind, but it typically fits well and should stand up to the rigors of physical exertion.The v-neck is also modest. Other shirts often have really deep v-necks that put all of your chest hair on display. These are more reserved and presentable.The sleeves are admittedly really short, at least on me. Not a huge deal.

I have been wearing Calvin Klein’s micro modal v-neck and crew neck t-shirts for years as both undershirts and casual lounging shirts / pajama shirts, and was willing to pay the premium price tag because I was never able to find anything better; they’re soft, fit nicely and have just the right amount of stretch.And then I decided to go out on a limb and try these David Archy v-necks, fully expecting to regret the decision and deal with the annoyance of returning them but figured it was worth the risk given the significantly lower price point.I’m glad I took the risk. Much to my surprise, I found the David Archy product to be superior in every respect notwithstanding the lower price. Specifically:(1) The David Archy shirts stay feeling softer / newer for longer thank the CK shirts, which seem to loose some of their ultra comfortable feel after a few weeks of wear.(2) The shirts feel slightly thicker and higher quality than their CK counterparts and as a result are more durable through numerous wash cycles. Not only does the fabric itself hold up better but the whites stay whiter and blacks stay blacker longer.(3) They don’t have any annoying tags sewn into the inside of the shirt that wind up being scratchy against your skin.(4) The “v” in the v-neck generally holds up better than the CK version, which seems to get a big crinkly and not as crisp after a few washes.(5) I find that the shirts just generally drape better over my body (athletic build) than the CK shirts.In my view, the only drawback of these David Archy shirts is that they only come in a v-neck version (at least at the time of this review); I wish they also made a crew neck version.If you’ve got a drawer full of CK micro modal t-shirts like I once had and are considering taking a chance on this David Archy product as an alternative, I’d strongly encourage you to do so. You won’t be disappointed. Never mind the lower price — it is simply a superior product.

Good quality

I initially balked at the price tag as $40 for 3 undershirts seems a bit unreasonable. But after purchasing multi packs of Hanes, FOTL, Jockey, Sax, Klein, etc and having issues with size, longevity, shape , etc. I decided to splurge. So tired of shirts coming untucked or riding up at night. Out of the box the fabric is silky and smooth with just enough stretch, but not too much. Fit was perfect. I purchased large and it was not drape and not tight like a compression t. The length was better than any other of the aforementioned bands which lost shape and skimped on fabric. I’m 5’8”, 190 and wear a 41S jacket so I’m not exactly an NBA center.. After washing the softness remained. Really couldn’t be happier with the quality. After 3 months, I will assess the durability and if they hold up will purchase more despite the high price tag. These look so good, you could wear them as a regular shirt.